IAM & Labs · 2026-10-25

IAM Sounds Boring. That's Part of Why IT People Overlook It.

IAM work can start with a simple question: who still needs access to an application?

Answering it may require finding an owner, understanding a group, checking an employee's current responsibilities, and coordinating a change. The interesting work is often figuring out why a permission exists—not clicking the button that removes it.

That makes identity worth investigating if you enjoy untangling technical and business problems. It also means you should look beyond the job title and decide whether you like the coordination involved.

Follow one permission until it has an owner

Imagine a fictional application with an old group named “Operations Users.”

An employee belongs to it. Nobody can immediately explain what that membership permits.

You could remove the employee and see who complains. You could leave everything alone. Neither is much of a process.

A better approach begins with questions: what does the group grant, who owns the resource, what work requires it, and who can decide whether access remains appropriate?

You may need technical inspection and a conversation with the business.

The satisfying part is turning an unclear situation into something people can understand and maintain.

Boring work can require careful judgment

Some tasks look repetitive because the request format repeats.

The details still matter. A routine access request may be missing an approval. A transfer may require old permissions to disappear. An exception may be temporary but have no review date.

You don't need to treat every request as a crisis. You do need enough judgment to know when the standard action doesn't fit.

This is why the field isn't a refuge from thinking.

Someone has to connect the stated business need with the access being granted. The administrative action is the visible end of that decision.

Check whether you enjoy the less exciting parts of IAM

Every specialty includes routine work. In identity, that can mean chasing an application owner's decision, explaining why a request lacks approval, or updating documentation after a change.

Before choosing this field, ask:

You don't have to love every task. You should understand which frustrations you can tolerate consistently.

Someone who enjoys configuration but dislikes all coordination should read the role carefully. A familiar product list won't reveal how much time the job spends getting people to agree on access.

Try a cleanup project in a fictional environment

You can test your interest without borrowing a real organization's mess.

Create a small fictional employee list, a few applications, and a handful of access assignments. Deliberately leave one assignment without an owner and another with an expired business justification.

Your task is to produce a cleaned-up access record.

Explain which access remains, which needs review, who should approve the decision, and how you'd verify an agreed change.

Don't pretend every uncertainty can be solved by a script. Sometimes the missing input is a human decision.

That distinction is part of understanding the work.

Choose a role, not the word IAM

Identity positions vary. One role may spend more time on application integrations. Another may emphasize governance, directory administration, privileged access, or customer identity.

Read the responsibilities closely. Ask what the team actually does and where the role fits.

Don't assume the same on-call expectations, technical depth, or workflow across every employer using the acronym.

And don't choose it just because someone on the internet promised low stress and high pay. Those promises skip too many details.

You want work you can become good at and a role you can realistically pursue.

My The Six-Figure IAM Career Playbook helps distinguish the main directions and choose practical projects for the next step. The ebook is $9.

IAM may never be your favorite word in a headline.

But when you start with a forgotten permission and finish with a clear, tested access decision, the work can be a lot more engaging than its reputation suggests.

Originally published on CyberAndChill.

← All articles